Generative Native World: Digital Data as the New Ankle Monitor
In the shadowy, futuristic cityscape, as the 21-year-old blonde woman sits at a small café table, her exhaustion is mirrored in the faint, pulsing glow of the digital ankle monitor clasped around her ankle. This sleek device, seemingly innocuous, represents far more than simple tracking—it is a constant reminder of her subjugation in this surveillance-driven society. As she absently gazes at the small holographic screen in front of her, bombarding her with endless streams of curated content, the true extent of this invasion of privacy becomes clear.
Outside the café, towering holographic billboards dominate the skyline. Their omnipresent advertisements shift constantly, flickering with bright, mesmerizing visuals that reflect in the café windows, casting shadows over the woman. But the connection between these billboards and her ankle monitor runs far deeper than mere coincidence. The billboards are not just passive advertisements; they are linked directly to the data collected from her ankle monitor and countless others like hers. The moment she steps near these towering displays, they update in real time, using her location and personal data to tailor messages specifically to her, invading her privacy in a way that feels dark and inhuman.
Every flicker of the holographic billboards is a reflection of her digital life—her preferences, her movements, her private thoughts, all harvested by the monopolized digital network and projected back at her in a highly targeted, relentless stream. The ankle monitor is not simply a tool for tracking her location, but a gateway for extracting intimate details about her daily existence, feeding that information into the city’s algorithmic machine. In this world, every step she takes is mapped, analyzed, and used against her, creating a cycle of control that strips away her individuality and humanity.
As she watches the billboards, she realizes that she is no longer an autonomous being in this city. The correlation between the ankle monitor and the holographic billboards is stark—both serve as extensions of a system that thrives on the exploitation of personal data, reducing her life to a mere input for targeted manipulation. The bright lights and cheerful messages that dance across the billboards are disturbingly at odds with the dark reality of the world she inhabits, where even her thoughts are not her own, and her very presence is surveilled and monetized. The city itself has become an extension of this invasive system, every surface reflecting the cold, impersonal gaze of the digital network that watches, tracks, and controls her every move.
In our generative native world, digital data has effectively become the new ankle monitor, a notion underscored by the Supreme Court's decision in Carpenter v. United States (2018). In this landmark case, the Court held that law enforcement must obtain a warrant to access historical cell phone location records, acknowledging the intimate details that digital data can reveal about individuals and extending privacy protections to encompass modern technological realities. As Chief Justice John Roberts noted,
"When the Government tracks the location of a cell phone, it achieves near perfect surveillance, as if it had attached an ankle monitor to the phone's user."
In the spirit of the U.S. Constitution and our values, social media networks and consumer device manufacturers should adopt opt-in policies rather than opt-out ones, ensuring that individuals have greater control over their personal data.
Further read
From Infinite Improbability to Generative AI: Navigating Imagination in Fiction and Technology
Human vs. AI in Reinforcement Learning through Human Feedback
Generative AI for Law: The Agile Legal Business Model for Law Firms
Generative AI for Law: From Harvard Law School to the Modern JD
Unjust Law is Itself a Species of Violence: Oversight vs. Regulating AI
Generative AI for Law: Technological Competence of a Judge & Prosecutor
Law is Not Logic: The Exponential Dilemma in Generative AI Governance
Generative AI & Law: I Am an American Day in Central Park, 1944
Generative AI & Law: Title 35 in 2024++ with Non-human Inventors
Generative AI & Law: Similarity Between AI and Mice as a Means to Invent
Generative AI & Law: The Evolving Role of Judges in the Federal Judiciary in the Age of AI
Embedding Cultural Value of a Society into Large Language Models (LLMs)
Lessons in Leadership: The Fall of the Roman Republic and the Rise of Julius Caesar
Justice Sotomayor on Consequence of a Procedure or Substance
From France to the EU: A Test-and-Expand Approach to EU AI Regulation
Beyond Human: Envisioning Unique Forms of Consciousness in AI
Protoconsciousness in AGI: Pathways to Artificial Consciousness
Artificial Consciousness as a Way to Mitigate AI Existential Risk
Human Memory & LLM Efficiency: Optimized Learning through Temporal Memory
Adaptive Minds and Efficient Machines: Brain vs. Transformer Attention Systems
Self-aware LLMs Inspired by Metacognition as a Step Towards AGI
The Balance of Laws with Considerations of Fairness, Equity, and Ethics
AI Recommender Systems and First-Party vs. Third-Party Speech
Building Products that Survive the Times at Robometrics® Machines
Autoregressive LLMs and the Limits of the Law of Accelerated Returns
The Power of Branding and Perception: McDonald’s as a Case Study
Monopoly of Minds: Ensnared in the AI Company's Dystopian Web